Needs for Maxillo-Facial Prosthesis in Patients with Acquired Orofacial Loss of Substance in Two Hospitals in Yaoundé

Authors

  • Rose Mbédé Nga Mvondo 1. Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences Biomédicales
  • Jacques Edouma Bohimbo 1. Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences Biomédicales
  • Etienne Atenguena 1. Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences Biomédicales
  • Jozima Christian Onana 1. Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences Biomédicales
  • Laura Magne 1. Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences Biomédicales
  • Charles Bengondo Messanga 1. Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences Biomédicales

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/hra.v3i2.6417

Keywords:

Substance loss, needs acquired, maxillo-facial pathologies, protheses, Yaoundé

Abstract

Introduction. In Cameroon, little scientific work has been devoted to maxillofacial substance loss (MSL) and maxillofacial prosthetic needs. The aim of our study was to evaluate the need for maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with acquired maxillofacial SDB in the city of Yaoundé. Methodology. We carried out a descriptive cross-sectional study over a period of eight months, from November 2023 to June 2024 in 2 hospitals, namely: Yaoundé University Hospital (CHUY) and Yaoundé Central Hospital (HCY). The patients included were those who had suffered maxillofacial trauma, benign or malignant tumour pathologies with sequelae of substance loss requiring maxillofacial rehabilitation or who had maxillofacial substance loss. Results. We registered 30 patients with a sex ratio of 1.72. The mean age was 34.17 years. The aetiology of maxillofacial PDS was consecutive to an interrupting excision or enucleation of the tumour in 95% of cases. Benign tumours were the most common (89.29%). Loss of substance was more common in the mandible (86.67%). Loss of substance in the mandible was classified by CARIOU as follows: non-interrupting loss of substance, type Aa (11.53%), type Ab (3.85%), type La (19.23%) and type Lb (19.23%). Aesthetic damage was the main reason for rehabilitation in 91.66% of cases. Loss of mandibular interrupting substance was reconstructed using titanium plates in 80% of cases. The need for exoprostheses was observed in 92.30% of cases, all represented by endo-oral prostheses. Conclusion. The need for prosthetic rehabilitation to alleviate maxillofacial SDB arises essentially from benign aetiologies and mainly concerns the mandible.

References

1. El Achhab I. La prothèse maxillo-faciale au sein d’un centre de lutte contre le cancer. Actual Odonto-Stomatol. 2012;13(258):175‑91.

2. Azdanie N, Manderson RD. Prosthetic management and réhabilitation of an extensive intraoral and facial defect. Int J Prosthodont. 1989;2(6):550-4.

3. Ogunrinde TJ, Ajayi DM, Dosumu OO, Olawale OF, Olusanya AA. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of maxillofacial defect in a Nigérian Teaching Hospital: A 9-year review. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2020;18:146-51.

4. Omole Omo J. Oseremen Akhigbemen, Enabulele JE. Pattern of maxillofacial rehabilitation in a Nigérian tertiary hospital. Lasujds. 2022;2(1) :15-19.

5. Shetty V, Niederdellmann H. An unusal occupational injury. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1989;68(3):670-1.

6. Brandâo,Thais Bianca, Vechiato Filho , Aljomar José, De Souza B, Eduardo V, et al. Assessment of treatment outcomes for facial prostheses in patients with craniofacial defects: pilot retrospective study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2017 ;118(2) :235-241.

7. Tagba E., Syan A., Ndiaye. Aspects diagnostiques et résultats du traitement chirurgical des tumeurs maxillo-mandibulaires: à propos de 23 cas. Journal Africain du Cancer. 2014 ; 6(4):228-234.

8. Ladeine A., Ajayi D., Ogunlewe M., Adeyemo W., Arotiba G., Bamgbose B. et al.Tumeurs odontogènes: un examen de 319 cas dans un hôpital d'enseignement du Nigeria. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol endod. 2005; 99 (2) :191-5.

9. Sriram G., Shetty R.P. (2008, Jun). Odontogenic tumors: a study of 250 cases in an Indian teaching hospital. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 105(6), p14-21

10. Anyanechi CE, Saheeb BD. A review of 156 odontogenic tumours in Calabar, Nigeria. Ghana Med J. 2014 ;48(3):163-7.

11. Boubacar BA, Singaré, Doumbia Kadiatou, Diallo, Mahamadou, et al. L'améloblastome mandibulaire : à propos de 51 cas. Médecine Buccale Chirurgie Buccale. 2016 ;22(1) :7-11.

12. Gastaldi G, Palumbo L, Moreschi C, Gherlone EF, Capparé P. Prosthetic management of patients with oro-maxillo-facial defects: a long-term follow-up retrospective study. Oral Implantol. 2017;10(3):276-282.

13. Schlieve T, Hull W, Miloro M, Kolokythas A.Is immediate reconstruction of the mandible with non-vascularized bone graft following resection of benigne pathology a viable treatment option. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73:541-549.

14. Kohen EL., Benjelloun A., Benchekroun L., Lazrak A., Jazouli N., KzadrI M.Les reconstructions mandibulaires évolution des techniques opératoires à-propos de 22 cas. Rev. Stomat. Chir. Maxillofac. 2004; 105(6); 347-353.

Published

27-01-2025

How to Cite

Rose Mbédé Nga Mvondo, Jacques Edouma Bohimbo, Etienne Atenguena, Jozima Christian Onana, Laura Magne, & Charles Bengondo Messanga. (2025). Needs for Maxillo-Facial Prosthesis in Patients with Acquired Orofacial Loss of Substance in Two Hospitals in Yaoundé. HEALTH RESEARCH IN AFRICA, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/hra.v3i2.6417

Issue

Section

Medicine and Surgery in the Tropics

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.