Main Article Content

Abstract


ABSTRACT
Background. Constrictive pericarditis is the result of a spectrum of primary cardiac and non-cardiac conditions, resulting in impaired diastolic function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes following treatment of constrictive pericarditis by pericardiectomy. Patients and methods. Between January 2010 and December 2019, patients who underwent pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis were retrospectively examined. All patients underwent pericardiectomy by median sternotomy, phrenic-to-phenic. Demographic, pre-, intra- and postoperative data and mid-term outcomes were analyzed. Results. A total of 25 patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis. The mean age was 39 ± 12.4 years, with 80 % of patients were males. Dyspnea was the most complaint symptoms. Seventy-eight percent of patients were in stage III-IV of NYHA, and most patients were idiopathic in 44.4 %. In hospital mortality was 4%, in malignancies aetiologies. Mean duration of the pericardiectomy was 125 ± 25.5 min. The mean preoperative central venous pressures was 18 ± 3.5 vs 9.5 ± 1.2 mm Hg postoperatively (p < 0.05). Postoperative complications noted were pleural effusion, long-term intubation, pulmonary infection, low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding. Late mortality rate was 8%, in the sub group of patients with malignancies. Mean follow-up time was 48 ± 24.5 months. The actuarial survival rates were 94 %, 88 % and 86 % at 1, 2 and 5 years, respectively. Conclusion. When performing early before onset of congestive symptoms, pericardiectomy might achieve to good results. Malignancies aetiologies usually had poor prognosis.


RÉSUMÉ
Introduction. La péricardite chronique constrictive peut être secondaire à une pathologie cardiaque ou extracardiaque, entrainant une dysfonction diastolique. L’objectif de ce travail était d’évaluer les résultats à mi-parcours d’une péricardectomie. Patients et méthodes. Entre janvier 2010 et décembre 2019, tout patient opéré pour péricardite chronique constrictive a été inclus. Elle se déroule par sternotomie médiane, et la résection s’est faite de manière phréno-phrénique. Les variables démographiques, préopératoires, postopératoires ont été analysées. Résultats. Vingt-cinq patients ont été opérés. L’âge moyen était de 39 ± 12.4 ans, avec 80 % de patient de sexe masculin. La dyspnée était la plainte principale. Soixante-dix-huit pourcents de patients étaient en stade III-IV de NYHA. L’étiologie idiopathique représentait 44,4 %. Mortalité hospitalière était de 4 %, chez les patients ayant un cancer. La durée moyenne de péricardectomie était de 125 ± 25.5 min. La pression veineuse centrale préopératoire était de 18 ± 3.5 vs 9.5 ± 1.2 mm Hg (p < 0.05). Les complications postopératoires ont été : pleurésie, infection pulmonaire, bas débit cardiaque, intubation prolongée, saignement. Mortalité à moyen terme était de 8 %, chez les patients ayant un cancer. La durée moyenne de suivi 48 ± 24.5 mois. Le taux de survie était de 98%, 88%, et 86%, respectivement à un an, deux, et cinq ans. Conclusion. La péricardectomie donne d’excellents résultats quand elle est réalisée avant la survenue des signes de congestion. L’étiologie cancéreuse présente un pronostic péjoratif.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sayah, R. ., Atipo-galloye, R., Moumpala, S., & Tseyi Ossere, B. . (2022). Mid-Term Outcome of Pericardiectomy for Chronic Constrictive Pericarditis. HEALTH SCIENCES AND DISEASE, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/hsd.v23i2.3354

References

  1. Madeira M, Teixeira R, Costa M, Gonçalves L, Klein AL (2016) Two-dimensional speckle tracking cardiac mechanics and constrictive pericarditis : systematic review. Echocardiography 33 :1589–1599.
  2. Welch TD (2018) Constrictive pericarditis : diagnosis, management and clinical outcomes. Heart 104 :725–31.
  3. Garcia MJ (2016) Constrictive pericarditis versus restrictive cardiomyopathy ? J Am Coll Cardiol 67 :2061–207.
  4. Yangni-Angate KH, Tanauh Y, Meneas C, Diby F, Adoubi A, Diomande M (2016) Surgical experience on chronic constrictive pericarditis in African setting : review of 35 years’ experience in Cote d’Ivoire. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 6 : S13–S19.
  5. Kumawat M, Lahiri TK, Agarwal D (2018) Constrictive pericarditis : retrospective study of 109 patients. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 26 :347–352.
  6. Szabó G, Schmack B, Bulut C, Soós P, Weymann A, Stadtfeld S, Karck M (2013) Constrictive pericarditis : risks, aetiologies and outcomes after total pericardiectomy : 24 years of experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 44 :1023–1028.
  7. George TJ, Arnaoutakis GJ, Beaty CA, Kilic A, Baumgartner WA, Conte JV. Contemporary aetiologies, risk factors and outcomes after pericardiectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2012 ;94 :445-51.
  8. Mutyaba AK, Balkaran S, Cloete R, et al. Constrictive pericarditis requiring pericardiectomy at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa : causes and perioperative outcomes in the HIV era (1990–2012). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 ;148(6) :3058–3065.
  9. Ling LH, Oh JK, Schaff HV, Danielson GK, Mahoney DW, Seward JB, et al. “Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: evolving clinical spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardiectomy”. Circulation. 1999 ;100(no. 13) : 1380-6.
  10. Delorme E. Sur un traitement chirurgical : De la symphyse cardopéricardique. Gaz Des Hôp. 1898 ;71 :1150-1.
  11. Rehn L. Ueber pericardiale Verwachsungen. Med Klin. 1920 ;16 : 991.
  12. Churchill ED. Decortication of the heart (Delorme) for adhesive pericarditis. Arch Surg. 1929 ;19 :1457.
  13. Pichel IA, Concepcion Fernandez Cimadevilla O, de la Hera JM, et al. Constrictive pericarditis : early diagnosis for a better prognosis [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 ;148(4) :1766.
  14. Syed FF, Mayosi BM. A modern approach to tuberculous pericarditis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2007 ;50 :218-36.
  15. Cinar B, Enç Y, Göksel O, et al. Chronic constrictive tuberculous pericarditis : Risk factors and outcome of pericardiectomy. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2006 ;10 :701-6.
  16. Augustin P, Desmard M, Mordant P, et al. Clinical review : intrapericardial fibrinolysis in management of purulent pericarditis. Crit Care 2011 ;15 :220.
  17. Ariyoshi T, Hashizume K, Taniguchi S, Miura T, Tanigawa K, Matsukuma S, et al. Surgical experience with chronic constrictive pericarditis. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 ;60 :796–802.
  18. Bertog SC, Thambidorai SK, Parakh K, Schoenhagen P, Ozduran V, Houghtaling PL, et al. Constrictive pericarditis : etiology and cause-specific survival after pericardiectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 ;43(8) :1445-52.
  19. Lin Y, Zhou M, Xiao J, Wang B, Wang Z. Treating constrictive pericarditis in a Chinese single-center study : A five-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 ;94 :1235-40.
  20. Buyukbayrak F, Aksoy E, Dedemoglu M, Kirali K, Alp HM. Pericardiectomy for treatment of neoplastic constrictive pericarditis. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2014 ;22(3) :296-300.
  21. Avgerinos D, Rabitnokov Y, Worku B, Neragi-Miandoab S, Girardi LN. Fifteen-year experience and outcomes of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. J Card Surg. 2014 ;29(4) :434-8.