Article Sidebar

Download
PDF

Main Article Content

Abstract


RÉSUMÉ
Introduction. La réalisation des prothèses implantaires est en vogue dans le monde. L’objectif général est de faire le bilan de l’évolution sur le choix des techniques d’imagerie dans la planification d’un projet de réalisation des prothèses implanto-portées et l’état de leur mise en œuvre. Méthode. Une recherche des articles publiés de janvier 1980 jusqu’au 31 décembre 2020 de PubMed, Cochrane et Google Scholar, a été réalisée. Sur les 90 études retenues pour une analyse finale, 43 études traitent de la planification. Résultats. La technique manuelle de planification (100%) était la seule technique utilisée depuis les années 80 jusqu’à ce qu’apparaissent les techniques numériques dans les années 2006. De ce fait, la technique partiellement numérique était la plus utilisée jusqu’ en 2015. En revanche, pendant ces dernières années, la technique entièrement numérique est beaucoup plus utilisée. La corrélation de l’évolution de la technique manuelle et la technique numérique montre que l’usage de la technique manuelle diminue au profit de la technique numérique. Ainsi, les radiographies panoramique et tomodensitométrique, les seules techniques utilisées depuis les années 80 jusqu’en 2005, ne sont plus utilisées depuis 2016. La nouvelle technique de radiographie, Cone beam qui a commencé à être pratiquée à partir des années 2000 est la plus utilisée au cours de ces deux décennies et est presque la seule radiographie utilisée depuis 2016. Conclusion. Les techniques d’imagerie dans la planification en prothèses implanto-portées au cours des 40 dernières années ont considérablement évolué.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. For multiple years now, the realization of implant prostheses has been increasingly popular throughout the world. The general objective is to review the evolution of the choice of techniques in the planning of implant-supported prostheses and the status of their implementation. Method. A search of published articles from January 1980 to 31 December 2020 from PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, was conducted. Of the 90 studies selected for final analysis, 43 studies dealt with planning. Results. The manual planning technique (100%) was the only technique used since the 1980s until the digital techniques appeared in 2006. Therefore, the partially digital technique was the most used until 2015. In contrast, during the last few years, the fully digital technique is much more used. The correlation of the evolution of the manual and digital techniques shows that the use of the manual technique is decreasing in favour of the digital technique. For example, panoramic and CT radiography, the only techniques used from the 1980s until 2005, are no longer used since 2016. The new radiography technique, Cone beam, which started to be used from the 2000s onwards, is the most used technique during these two decades and is almost the only radiography used since 2016. Conclusion. Imaging techniques for planning implant-supported prostheses have evolved over the last 40 years.

Keywords

Dental implants-planning Implants Implant-supported dental prothesis Planification implanto-prothétique Implants dentaires Prothèse Dentaire Implanto-Portée

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Allou Amoin Georgette Marina, Kouadio Ayepa Alain, Ndjoh Jules Julien, Kouamé Yao Alexis, & Koffi N’Goran Justin. (2023). Prothèses Implantaires : Évolution des Techniques d’Imagerie dans la Planification, 40 Ans Après. Une Revue Systématique. HEALTH SCIENCES AND DISEASE, 24(6). https://doi.org/10.5281/hsd.v24i6.4512
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. FAVIER B, DEMARCY M PHILBERT M FROMENTIN O. Planification implanto-prothetique: évolution des protocoles. Inf Dent 2021. 33 : 24-38.
  2. ANGELOPOULOS C, AGHALOO T. Imaging technology in implant diagnosis. Dent Clin North Am. 2011 Jan;55(1):141-58
  3. DAVARPANAH M, SZMUKLER-MONCLER S RAJZBAUM P. Manuel d’implantologie clinique. Paris. 4ème edition. Ed CdP, 2018. 720p
  4. GALLUCI G, EVANS C-H TAHMASEB A ASSÉNAT S. Les flux numériques en implantologie dentaires. Paris Quintess int 2020. 299p.
  5. LIU X, YAO TAN Y, LIU J, TAN J. A digital technique for fabricating implant-supported interim restorations in the esthetic zone. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Apr;119(4):540-544.
  6. PARTHIBAN PS, LAKSHMI RV, MAHENDRA J, SREEKUMAR K, NAMASIVAYAM A. A contemporary approach for treatment planning of horizontally resorbed alveolar ridge: Ridge split technique with simultaneous implant placement using platelet rich fibrin membrane application in mandibular anterior region. Indian J Dent Res. Jan-Feb 2017;28(1):109-113.
  7. BUSER D, SENNERBY L, DE BRUYN H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb.
  8. MOHER D, LIBERATI A, TETZLAFF J, ALTMAN D. Preferredre porting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009; 339: b2535-b2535. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. Sep-Oct 2015;30(5):1076-83.
  9. KRAUT RA. Utilization of 3D/Dental software for precise implant site selection: clinical reports. Summer 1992;1(2):134-9
  10. LAM EW, RUPRECHT A, YANG J. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. J Prosthet Dent 1995 Jul;74(1):42-6.
  11. EUFINGER H, KÖNIG S, EUFINGER A. The role of alveolar ridge width in dental implantology. Clin Oral Investig1997 Dec;1(4):169-77
  12. DIXON DR, MORGAN R, HOLLENDER LG, ROBERTS FA, O'NEAL RB. Clinical application of spiral tomography in anterior implant placement: case report. J Periodontol 2002 Oct;73(10):1202-9.
  13. VAZQUEZ L, SAULACIC N, BELSER U, BERNARD JP. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jan;19(1):81-5.
  14. TALWAR N, CHAND P, SINGH BP, RAO J, PAL US, RAM H. Evaluation of the efficacy of a prosthodontic stent in determining the position of dental implants. J Prosthodont. 2012 Jan;21(1):42-7.
  15. FORTIN T, CAMBY E, ALIK M, ISIDORI M, BOUCHET H. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Apr;15(2):198-204.
  16. BACIUT M, HEDESIU M, BRAN S, JACOBS R , NACKAERTS O, BACIUT G. Pre- and postoperative assessment of sinus grafting procedures using cone-beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 May;24(5):512-6.
  17. GUERRERO ME, NORIEGA J, REINHILDE J. Preoperative implant planning considering alveolar bone grafting needs and complication prediction using panoramic versus CBCT images. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014 Sep;44(3):213-20.
  18. BORNSTEIN M, BRÜGGER OE, JANNER FM et al. Indications and Frequency for the Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Implant Treatment Planning in a Specialty Clinic. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. Sep-Oct 2015;30(5):1076-83.
  19. BALSHI SF, WOLFINGER GJ, BALSHI TJ. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer technology and medical imaging for immediate loading of implants in the pterygomaxillary region. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006 Jun;26(3):239-47
  20. OZKURT Z, DUYGU G, CANPOLAT C, KAZAZOGLU E. Reconstruction of edentulous maxillary and mandibular arches with implant-supported fixed restorations using a digital treatment planning technique: a clinical report. J Oral Implantol 2008;34(3):161-8.
  21. NIKZAD S, AZARI A. Computer-assisted implant surgery; a flapless surgical/immediate loaded approach with 1 year follow-up. Int J Med Robot. 2008 Dec;4(4):348-54.
  22. SPECTOR L. Computer-aided dental implant planning. Dent Clin North Am. 2008 Oct;52(4):761-75
  23. KATSOULIS J, PAZERA P, MERICSKE-STERN R. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Sep;11(3):238-45.
  24. ARISAN V, KARABUDA ZC, OZDEMIR T. Computer-assisted implant surgery; a flapless surgical/immediate loaded approach with 1 year follow-up. J Periodontol. 2010 Jan;81(1):43-51.
  25. PAPASPYRIDAKOS P, KUNAL L Immediate loading of the maxilla with prefabricated interim prosthesis using interactive planning software, and CAD/CAM rehabilitation with definitive zirconia prosthesis: 2-year clinical follow-up. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010 Aug; 22(4):223-32.
  26. DE SANTIS D, CANTON L C, CUCCHI A et al. Computer-assisted surgery in the lower jaw: double surgical guide for immediately loaded implants in postextractive sites-technical notes and a case report. J Oral Implantol. 2010;36(1):61-8.
  27. PHOPHI K, GEORGE P, PHOEBOUS M. Presentation of two cases of immediate restoration of implants in the esthetic region, using facilitate software and guides with stereolithographic model surgery prior to patient surgery. J Prosthodont 2012 Feb;21(2):130-7.
  28. PLATZER S, BERTHA G, HESCHL A, WEGSCHEIDER WA, LORENZONI M. Three-dimensional accuracy of guided implant placement: indirect assessment of clinical outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Oct;15(5):724-34.
  29. MARTINS RJC, LEDERMAN HM. Virtual planning and construction of prototyped surgical guide in implant surgery with maxillary sinus bone graft. Acta Cir Bras. 2013 Sep;28(9):683-90.
  30. GAILLARD JC. BELLAMY. Apport d’un pilier implantaire en céramique pressée. Implant 2013;19:45-50
  31. SATO D, KANAZAWA M, KIM YK, et al. Immediate loading of two freestanding implants placed by computer-guided flapless surgery supporting a mandibular overdenture with magnetic attachments. J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Jan;60(1):54-62.
  32. GREENBERG MA. Advanced dental implant placement techniques. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017 Dec 2;51(3 Suppl 1):S76-S89.
  33. KAEWSIRI D, PANMEKIATE S, SUBBALEKHA K, MATTHEOS N, PIMKHAOKHAM A. The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Jun;30(6):505-514.
  34. JOHNSON AC, JAIN V, AHUJA S. Modified Technique for CAD/CAM Guided Implant Planning in the Presence of Existing Hopeless Teeth. J Dent (Shiraz). 2020 Mar;21(1):69-72.
  35. ZEL JMV. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology. J Prosthodont. 2008 Aug;17(6):476-81.
  36. BALASUNDARAM A, GURUN D, NEELY A, ASH-RAFZADEH A, RAVICHANDRA J. Novel CBCT and optical scanner-based implant treatment planning using a stereolithographic surgical guide: a multipronged diagnostic approach. Implant Dent. 2014 Aug;23(4):401-6.
  37. SCHNITMAN PA, HAN RK. Completely Digital Two-Visit Immediately Loaded Implants: Proof of Concept. J Oral Implantol. 2015 Aug;41(4):429-36.
  38. DADA K, PARIENTE L, DAAS M. Strategic extraction protocol: Use of an image-fusion stereolithographic guide for immediate implant placement. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Nov;116(5):652-656.
  39. KIM JE, SHIM JS. Computer-guided implant planning using a preexisting removable partial dental prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jan;117(1):13-17.
  40. ACKER R, CHABRERON O. Implantologie guidée en CFAO directe du wax-up numérique a la prothèse d’usage. Implant 2016. https://www.lefildentaire.com/articles/clinique/implantologie/implantologie-guidee-en-cfao-directe-du-wax-up-numerique-a-la-prothese-d-usage/
  41. VAFIADIS D, GARY G, DAVID GARBER D, ANTHONY LAMBRAKOS A, KOWALSKI BJ. Immediate Implant Placement of a Single Central Incisor Using a CAD/CAM Crown-Root Form Technique: Provisional to Final Restoration. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017 Feb;29(1):13-21.
  42. POPELUT A, GARY F, PIERRE M. Guide chirurgical en impression 3D Apport du numérique dans la gestion du profil d’émergence. Info Dent 2017 16 :1-10. https://garyfinelle.com/wp-content/uploads/2017-Popelut-Article-Guide-chirurgical-et-impression-3D-1.pdf
  43. PARA A. Intérêt des logiciels de planification implantaire dans la décision de traitement d’une périimplantite. Implant 2018 ; LS 79 :24-35.
  44. TALLARICO M, MARTINOLLI M, YONGJIN K et al. Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Template-Based Implant Placement Using Two Different Surgical Templates Designed with or without Metallic Sleeves: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Dent J (Basel). 2019 Apr 2;7(2):41.
  45. DE SIQUEIRA RA, CABRAL BL, SIQUEIRA GR, MENDONÇA G, WANG HL. Using Digital Technique to Obtain the Ideal Soft Tissue Contour in Immediate Implants With Provisionalization. Implant Dent. 2019 Aug;28(4):411-416.
  46. BELEY J, DUPONT D, JAGER J. Positionnement 3D des implants dans le secteur antérieur : enjeux et mise en œuvre. Info Dent 2019 ; 32 : 20-30.
  47. MAK A ; CHIO A, AUSTRALIE. Flux de travail entièrement numérique avec restaurations provisoires imprimées en 3D. GC get connected 2019 ; 14 : 4-10.
  48. LEITE FJ, MARTINS W, ROSIN HR, PIRES CR, LOPES FE, RICARDO RIBEIRO RR. A completely digital workflow for an interim implant-supported crown: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Mar;125(3):377-382.
  49. FLÜGGE T, LUDWIG U, HÖVENER JB, KOHAL R, WISMEIJER D, NELSON K. Virtual implant planning and fully guided implant surgery using magnetic resonance imaging-Proof of principle. lin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Jun;31(6):575-583.
  50. NDJOH JJ, ALLOU AGM, MENGONG MH, NDENG ALS, KOFFI NJ, MESSANGA BC. Comparaison de la perte osseuse marginale autour des implants en titane et en zircone : Essai clinique réalisé au Cameroun et en Belgique. Health Sci. Dis: Vol 24 (2) Suppl 1 February 2023 pp 36-43.
  51. MANGANO F, BIDZINA M, OLEG A. A Novel Full-Digital Protocol (SCAN-PLAN-MAKE-DONE ®) for the Design and Fabrication of Implant-Supported Monolithic Translucent Zirconia Crowns Cemented on Customized Hybrid Abutments: A Retrospective Clinical Study on 25 Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019 Jan 24;16(3):317.
  52. EKESTUBBE A, GRÖNDAHL K, GRÖNDAHL H G. The use of tomography for dental implant planning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997 Jul ; 26(4):206-13.