Main Article Content

Abstract

RÉSUMÉ
But. Décrire les effets néfastes des mutilations génitales féminines / excision (MGF/E) sur les fonctions sexuelles. Patientes et méthodes. Notre étude s'est déroulée dans le service d’obstétrique CHU Point G. Il s’agit d’une étude cas / témoins. Le cas était la femme excisée et le témoin, la femme non excisée. Notre étude a duré seize mois, du 01/01/2019 au 30/04/2020. L’étude a concerné les primipares de 14 à 49 ans excisées ou non. Aucune femme non consentante n’at été retenue. Le recueil des données a été fait sur questionnaires individuels. Résultats. Parmi les 1518 accouchées de la période d’étude, il y avait 266 femmes porteuses de MGF/E ; elles ont fait l’objet de notre travail. La tranche d'âge la plus représentée était  celle de 14 à 19 ans, soit 51,1% chez les cas et témoins. Les bambaras (34,6 %) et sonrhaïs (31,1%) étaient les ethnies  majoritaires dans les deux groupes.. Les mères analphabètes (57,8%) et celles du niveau secondaire (59,3%) étaient majoritaires chez les cas et les témoins. L’excision de type 3 a représenté 12 % des cas. Il y a eu 78,9% de complications psycho-sexuelles chez les femmes excisées contre 7,5% chez les non excisées et cette différence était statistiquement significative (P<0,05). Conclusion. Les MGF sont une pratique fréquente au Mali et sont une source notable de complications psycho-sexuelles. Des mesures doivent être prises pour la prévention et l’éradication de ce fléau.
ABSTRACT
Aim. To describe the harmful effects of female genital mutilation / excision (FGM / E) on sexual functions. Patients and methods. Our study was carried out in the obstetrics department CHU Point G. It was a case / control study. The case was the excised woman and the control, was the non-excised woman. Our study lasted sixteen months, from 01/01/2019 to 04/30/2020. We included, primiparas from 14 to 49 years old excised or not. All  women participating to the study gave their consent. The sample size was calculated based on the case / control sample. Data collection was done on individual questionnaires. Results. Among 1,518 deliveries during our study period,  there were 266 women with FGM E. The age group most represented was 14-19, or 51.1% in the cases and controls. The Bambara (34.6%) and Songhai’s (31.1%) were the main ethnic groups in the cases and the controls. Illiterate mothers (57.8%) and those limited to secondary level education (59.3%) were mostly represented.  Type 3 circumcision accounted for 12% of cases. There were 78.9% of psycho-sexual complications in the excised women against 7.5% in the non-excised and that difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion. FGM are still frequent practice in Mali.  They are cause significant psychosexual complications. Measures must be taken to control this situation.

Keywords

Mutilations Génitales Féminines complications psycho-sexuelles.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kanté Ibrahim, O., Traoré Mamadou, S., Coulibaly, A., Sima, M., Théra Tiounkani, A., Bocoum, A., Traoré Soumana, O., Kouma, A., Traoré, Y., & Teguété, I. (2020). Les Effets Néfastes des Mutilations Génitales Féminines / Excision sur les Fonctions Sexuelles. HEALTH SCIENCES AND DISEASE, 21(8). https://doi.org/10.5281/hsd.v21i8.2245

References

  1. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: a global concern. UNICEF, New York, 2016.
  2. UNICEF. Female genital mutilation. [Jan;2019 ];https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-protection/female-genital-mutilation/ 2019
  3. World Health Organization. Female Genital Mutilation. 2016. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/ [Google Scholar].
  4. Donohoe M. Female genital cutting: epidemiology, consequences and female empowerment as a means of cultural change. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/546497 Medscape Ob/Gyn. 2006; 11 [Google Scholar]
  5. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health. WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland: WHO; [Jan; 2019]. 2008. Eliminating female genital mutilation. An interagency statement. OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO. [Google Scholar]?
  6. Female genital mutilation/cutting. A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. United Nations Children’s Fund. Reprod Health Matters. 2013:184–190. [Google Scholar].
  7. Female genital cutting in the United States: implications for mental health professionals. Akinsulure-Smith AM, Sicalides EI. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2016;47:356–362. [Google Scholar.
  8. Enquête Démographique et de Santé du MALI (EDSM) 2018 PP : 383-356.
  9. Abdulcadir J and all: 2016 Feb; 13(2):226-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.023. Epub 2016 Jan 27. PMID: 26827253; DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.023. [Indexed for MEDLINE].
  10. Gudu W, and all: labor, delivery and postpartum complications in nulliparous women with female genital mutilation admitted to karamara hospital. Ethiop Med J. 2017 Jan; 55 (1):11-7.
  11. Andualem M. and all: determinants of female genital mutilation practices in east gojjam zone, western amhara, ethiopia. ethiop med j. 2016 jul;54(3):109-16.
  12. Biglu MH1 and all: Sex Reprod Healthc. 2016 Dec; 10:3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 28. PMID: 27938869. DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.07.002. [Indexed for MEDLINE];
  13. Abdulcadir J. and coll: J Sex Med. 2016 Feb;13(2):226-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.023. Epub 2016 Jan 27. PMID: 26827253. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.023. [Indexed for MEDLINE].
  14. Mestre-Bach G : Afr J Reprod Health. 2019 Mar;23(1):154-162. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2019/v23i1.16. PMID: 31034182. DOI: 10.29063/ajrh2019/v23i1.16. [Indexed for MEDLINE.
  15. . Vital M and all: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Jul;202:71-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.029. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
  16. Laura Buggio and all: Health Equity. 2019; 3(1): 36–46. Published online 2019 Feb 20. doi: 10.1089/heq.2018.0036. PMCID: PMC6386073. PMID: 30805570.

Most read articles by the same author(s)