Article Sidebar

Download
PDF

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction. Stability in implantology and periodontology can be assessed by both subjective and objective means. As the use of subjective measures can be biased, objective means such as the periotest and Ostell have been developed. However, its application in normal clinical therapy is ineffectual due to the absence of dental reference values. The objective of this study was to provide stability values for natural permanent teeth that could serve as benchmarks in periodontics and implantology. Methodology. We conducted a cross-sectional study at the Implant and Periodontology Laboratory, FMSB/UY1from December 2021 to May 2022. All students who gave informed consent and had no pathology, history of trauma or dental treatment were included. Three stability measurements were performed at 20 min intervals using a Periotest. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results. We recruited 120 patients and assessed 3204 teeth. The age group 18-20 years was the most represented. The periotest values of canines, premolars and molars were significantly higher in women (p<0.001). Also, the stability of maxillary teeth was significantly higher than that of the mandible (p<0.001). The most stable tooth was the canine (-2.47), followed by the molars (-1.84), premolars (-1.10) and incisors (2.42). With regard to the reproducibility of the periotest, no significant differences were observed between the 3 stability measurements performed. Conclusion. The stability values of all teeth were within the range of physiological values defined in the literature. The periotest is a reliable and reproducible test.

Keywords

Dent naturelle Implant Mobilité Periotest Natural tooth Implant Mobility Periotest

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Jules Julien Ndjoh, Metogo Ntsama Junie Annick, Romaric Onana, Zilefac Brian Ngokwe, Sandra lydie Akena Ndeng, Réné Ngoulma, Lawrence Essama Eno Belinga, & Vicky Ama Moor. (2023). Stabilité des Dents Permanentes des Etudiants de la Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences Biomédicales de l’Université de Yaoundé I. HEALTH SCIENCES AND DISEASE, 24(2 Suppl 1). https://doi.org/10.5281/hsd.v24i2 Suppl 1.4271
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Andresen M, Mackie I, Worthington H. Le Periotest en traumatologie. Part I. Does it have the properties necessary for use as a clinical device and can the measurements be interpreted ? Dent Traumatol Off Publ Int Assoc Dent Traumatol. 2003 Aug;19(4):214-7.
  2. Schulte W, Lukas D. La méthode du périotest. Int Dent J. 1992;42(6):433-40.
  3. Schulte W, d'Hoedt B, Lukas D, Maunz M, Steppeler M. Periotest for measuring periodontal characteristics--correlation with periodontal bone loss. J Periodontal Res. 1992 May;27(3):184-90.
  4. Tanaka E, Ueki K, Kikuzaki M, Yamada E, Takeuchi M, Dalla-Bona D, et al. Longitudinal measurements of tooth mobility during orthodontic treatment using a periotest. Angle Orthod. 2005 Jan;75(1):101-5.
  5. Levander E. Long-term follow-up of maxillary incisors with sever apical root resorption. Eur J Orthod. 2000 Feb 1;22(1):85-92.
  6. Mühlemann HR. La parodontométrie, une méthode pour mesurer la mobilité des dents. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1951;4(10):1220-33.
  7. Laster L, Laudenbach KW, Stoller NH. Une évaluation des mesures cliniques de la mobilité dentaire. J Periodontol. 1975 Oct;46(10):603-7.
  8. Mackie I, Ghrebi S, Worthington H. Measurement of tooth mobility in children using the periotest. Dent Traumatol. 1996 Jun;12(3):120-3.
  9. Van Steenberghe D, Rosenberg D, Naert IE, Van den Bossche L, Nys M. Assessment of periodontal tissues damping characteristics : current concepts and clinical trials. J Periodontol. 1995 Mar;66(3):165-70.
  10. Luxwolda MF, Kuipers RS, Kema IP, Dijck-Brouwer DAJ, Muskiet FAJ. Les populations vivant traditionnellement en Afrique de l'Est ont une concentration sérique moyenne de 25-hydroxyvitamine D de 115 nmol/l. Br J Nutr. 2012 Nov 14;108(9):1557-61.
  11. Larousse. Dictionnaire Larousse poche 2021 : 76000 définitions, noms communs, noms propres + un précis de grammaire + 84 tableaux de conjugaison... Paris : Dictionnaires Larousse ; 2020.
  12. Verchère L. Dictionnaire des termes odonto-stomatologiques. 3e éd. entièrement refondue. Paris Milan Barcelone : Masson ; 1992.
  13. Filippi A, Pohl Y, von Arx T. Treatment of replacement resorption by intentional replantation, resection of the ankylosed sites, and Emdogain--results of a 6-year survey. Dent Traumatol Off Publ Int Assoc Dent Traumatol. 2006 Dec;22(6):307-11.
  14. Bouchard P Brochery, Beno??t, Feghali M, Jaumet V, Kerner S, Korngold S, Malet J, et al. Parodontologie & dentisterie implantaire. Volume 1. 2015.
  15. Winkler S, Morris HF, Spray JR. Stability of implants and natural teeth as determined by the Periotest over 60 months of function. J Oral Implantol. 2001;27(4):198-203. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0198:SOIANT>2.3.CO;2. PMID: 12500879.

Most read articles by the same author(s)