Main Article Content

Abstract


RÉSUMÉ
Objectifs. Décrire les aspects cliniques, bactériologiques et évolutifs du sepsis et du choc septique dans le service de réanimation polyvalente du CHUB. Patients et méthodes. Il s’agit d’une étude transversale, monocentrique et descriptive, durant 12 mois, incluant les patients âgés d’au moins 18 ans admis en réanimation polyvalente pour un sepsis ou choc septique. Les variables épidémiologiques, cliniques, bactériologiques et évolutives ont été analysées avec Excel 2019. Résultats. 56 patients ont été retenus (20,7%). Leur âge moyen était de 43,1 ± 17,9 ans (extrêmes de 18 et 84 ans), avec 66,1% des hommes. Le foyer infectieux initial était péritonéal (64,3 %). À l’admission, le nombre médian de défaillances d’organes par patient était de trois (maximum 5). Les défaillances rénale (71,4%), hépatique (69,6%) et hémodynamique (62,5%) étaient les plus représentées. Le taux de réalisation du bilan bactériologique était de 35,7% : hémoculture (10,7%), uroculture (14,3%), porte d’entrée infectieuse (7,1%). La durée d’hospitalisation des patients sortis vivants était de 8,1 ± 6,3 jours (extrêmes de 2 et 31 jours). Le taux de mortalité était de 57,1%. Les décès survenaient au-delà de 24 h d’hospitalisation (75%), chez des patients avec comorbidités (65,6%), porte d’entrée péritonéale (59,4%), et défaillances hémodynamique (81,2%) et rénale (75%). Conclusion. Les prévalences du sepsis et du choc septique dans notre série sont superposables à celles de la littérature. Le taux de réalisation des bilans bactériologiques reste faible. La mortalité du sepsis demeure très élevée.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. No accurate data on sepsis and septic shock in intensive care unit (ICU) in the Republic of Congo are available. The aim of the study was to describe the course of patients with sepsis and/or septic shock in the polyvalent ICU of the University Teaching Hospital of Brazzaville. Patients and methods. This was a cross-sectional, monocentric and descriptive study, lasting 12 months, including patients aged at least 18 years admitted to ICU for sepsis or septic shock. The clinical presentation, the bacteriological findings and the outcome were analyzed with Excel 2019. Results. 56 patients were selected (20.7%). The average age was 43.1 ± 17.9 years (extremes 18 and 84 years), with 66.1% of men. The initial infection was peritoneal (64.3%). At admission, the median number of organ failures per patient was three (maximum 5). Renal (71.4%), hepatic (69.6%) and hemodynamic (62.5%) failures were the most common. Bacteriological assessment rate was 35.7%: blood culture (10.7%), urine culture (14.3%). The duration of hospitalization of alive patients was 8.1 ± 6.3 days (extremes 2 and 31 days). The mortality rate was 57.1%. Deaths occurred beyond 24 hours of hospitalization (75%), in patients with comorbidities (65.6%), peritonitis (59.4%), hemodynamic (81.2%) and renal (75%) failures. Conclusion. The prevalence of sepsis and septic shock in our study is comparable to other published series. The bacteriological assessments rate is still low. The mortality is very high.

Keywords

Sepsis Epidemiology Outcomes ICU Brazzaville Sepsis Epidémiologie Evolution Réanimation Brazzaville

Article Details

How to Cite
Gilles Niengo Outsouta, Christ Mayick Mpoy Emy Monkessa, Marie Elombila, Peggy Dahlia Gallou Leyono-Mawandza, Esther Nina Ontsira Ngoyi, Giresse Bienvenu Tsouassa Wa Ngono, Marina Aurole Bokoba-Nde Ngala, Ghislaine Bayoundoula, & Gilbert Fabrice Otiobanda. (2022). Sepsis et Choc Septique en Réanimation à Brazzaville (Congo). HEALTH SCIENCES AND DISEASE, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/hsd.v24i1.4135

References

  1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315(8):801-810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287
  2. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020; 395: 200–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7
  3. Sakr Y, Jaschinski U, Wittebole X, Szakmany T, Lipman J, Ñamendys-Silva SA, et al. Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Worldwide Data From the Intensive Care over Nations Audit. OFID 2018 ; 5 (12) ofy313, http://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy313
  4. Vincent JL, Marshall JC, Ñamendys-Silva SA, François B, Martin-Loeches I, Lipman J, et al. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness:the Intensive Care Over Nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2: 380–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70061-X
  5. Rylance J, Nsutebu E, Mergani KO, Grobusch MP, Jacob ST. The African Sepsis Alliance: making a difference in the fight against sepsis in Africa. Infection 2018; 46:733–734 https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-018-1184-7
  6. Mulatu HA, Bayisa T, Worku Y, Lazarus JL, Woldeyes E, Bacha D, et al. Prevalence and outcome of sepsis and septic shock in intensive care units in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A prospective observational study. AfJEM 2021; 11:188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2020.10.001
  7. Guibla I, Ilboudo SC, Bonkoungou P, Traore SIS, Yaro II, Romba B, et al. Sepsis en Réanimation: Épidémiologie, Modalités Thérapeutiques et Mortalité au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sourô Sanou de Bobo-Dioulasso. Health Sci Dis 2021; 22: 66-70. [www.hsd-fmsb.org]
  8. Metogo Mbengono JA, Noutakdie Tochie J, Ndom Ntock F, Nzouango YB, Kona S, Ngono Ateba G, et al. The Epidemiology, Therapeutic Patterns, Outcome, and Challenges in Managing Septic Shock in a Sub-Saharan African Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-Sectional Study. Hosp Pract Res 2019; 4(4):117-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/hpr.2019.24
  9. Sama HD, Kaboré RAF, OuroBang’naMaman AF, Kinhouandé MC, Egbohou P, Mouzou T, et al. Prise en charge du choc septique en réanimation chirurgicale au CHU Sylvanus Olympio de Lomé (Togo): étude observationnelle à propos de 40 cas. Rev Afr Anesth Méd Urg 2013 ;18 (1) : 40-43.
  10. Elombila M, Mpoy Emy Monkessa CM, Otiobanda GF, Ekouele Mbaki HB, Niengo Outsouta G, Nde Ngala MA. Epidemiology of Mortality in Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit at University Hospital of Brazzaville. OJEM 2018; 6: 112-121. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojem.2018.64013
  11. Mpoy Emy Monkessa CM, Leyono-Mawandza PDG, Elombila M, Niengo Outsouta G, Bokoba-Nde Ngala MA, Tsouassa Wa Ngono GB, et al. Acute Generalized Peritonitis in Intensive Care Unit at University Hospital of Brazzaville, Republic of Congo: Etiological, Therapeutic Aspects and Issues. OJEM 2020 ; 8 : 86-94. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojem.2020.84010
  12. Otiobanda GF, Elombila M, Mpoy Emy Monkessa MC, Mawandza PDG, Niengo Outsouta G. Profil des patients admis en Réanimation Polyvalente du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brazzaville. Rev Afr Anesth Méd Urg 2017 ; 22 (2) : 65-69.
  13. Comité de l’antibiogramme de la Société française de microbiologie. Recommandations ;2020, www.sfm-microbiologie.org.
  14. Vincent J-L, Jones G, David S, Olariu E, Cadwell KK. Frequency and mortality of septic shock in Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Care 2019; 23:196. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2478-6
  15. Lewis JM, Feasey NA, Rylance J. Aetiology and outcomes of sepsis in adults in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Care 2019; 23:212. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2501-y
  16. Vincent J-L, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, Ranieri M, Reinhart K, Gerlach H, et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: Results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 2006; 34 (2): 344-353. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000194725.48928.3A
  17. Okano JT, Sharp K, Valdano E, Palk L, Blower S. HIV transmission and source-sink dynamics in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet HIV 2020; 7(3): e209–e214. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30407-2.
  18. Vermund SH, Sheldon E,Sidat M. Southern Africa: The highest priority region for HIV prevention and care interventions. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2015; 12(2): 191–195. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-015-0270-z.
  19. Joshi K, Lessler J, Olawore O, Loevinsohn G, Bushey S, Tobian AAR, et al. Declining HIV incidence in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of empiric data. JIAS 2021, 24: e25818. | https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25818
  20. Touré AO, Cissé M, Ka I, Dieng M, Konaté I, Ka O, et al. Les sepsis intra-abdominaux diffus post-opératoires: aspects épidémiologiques, diagnostiques et thérapeutiques au Service de Chirurgie Générale du CHU Aristide Le Dantec de Dakar. PAMJ 2014 ; 17 :204. http://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.17.204.3111.
  21. Chang CC, Crane M, Zhou J, Mina M, Post JJ, Cameron BA, et al. HIV and co-infections. IMR 2013 Vol. 254: 114–142. http://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12063
  22. Barbier F, Mer M, Szychowiak P, Miller RF, Mariotte E, Galicier L, et al. Management of HIV infected patients in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:329–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-05945-3
  23. de Vaumas C, Montravers P, Dupont H. Syndromes occlusifs. EMC - Anesthésie-Réanimation 2008 ; 28 (1) : 1-13 [Article 36-726-A-50]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0246-0289(08)38440-0
  24. Montravers P, Dufour G, Daoud O, Balcan I. Péritonites. EMC - Anesthésie-Réanimation 2013 ;10(2) :1-16 [Article 36-726-A-30]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0246-0289(12)59046-8
  25. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017; 45 (3):486-552. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255
  26. Morton B, Stolbrink M, Kagima W, Rylance J, Mortimer K. The Early Recognition and Management of Sepsis in Sub-Saharan African Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15: 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15092017
  27. Meier B, Staton C. Sepsis Resuscitation in Resource-Limited Settings. Emerg Med Clin N Am 2017; 35:159–173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2016.08.004

Most read articles by the same author(s)