Main Article Content
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ
But. Décrire les aspects cliniques, thérapeutiques ainsi que le devenir maternel et fœtal des patientes porteuses d’une grossesse intra utérine évolutive au cours de laquelle elles ont bénéficié d’une coeliochirurgie. Méthodologie. Il s’agit d’une série de cas prospective, longitudinale et descriptive déroulée sur une période de 13 ans, allant de 2006 à 2019 au service de gynécologie obstétrique de l’Hôpital Militaire de Libreville. Nous avons inclus toutes les patientes porteuses d’une grossesse intra utérine évolutive ayant bénéficié d’une coeliochirurgie. Les paramètres pré, per, post opératoires ainsi que le devenir de la grossesse ont été analysés. Résultats. Treize gestantes ont été étudiées. Leur âge moyen était de 29 ans. La chirurgie a été réalisée en urgence, au premier trimestre de la grossesse chez 9 patientes (69,2%). L’aiguille de Palmer et le trocart caméra étaient introduits en sus ombilical chez 9 (69,2%). Le pneumopéritoine était réalisé avec l’aiguille de Palmer chez 10 patientes. À l’exploration, les lésions étaient localisées à droite chez 9 (69,2%) gestantes et à gauche chez 4 (30,8%). Nous avons retrouvé trois kystes ovariens persistant après 16 semaines d’aménorrhée (SA), sept cas de torsion de kyste de l’ovaire dont un cas de torsion d’annexe à 23 SA, un kyste para tubaire et une grossesse hétérotopique. Comme geste chirurgical, nous avons réalisé trois détorsions, quatre kystectomies, une annexectomie et une salpingectomie. Nous n’avons enregistré aucune complication per ou post opératoire. Douze patientes ont accouché par voie basse. Tous les nouveau-nés ont eu une bonne adaptation à la vie extra utérine. Conclusion. La cœlioscopie permet de prendre en charge les pathologies associées à la grossesse sans augmentation de la morbidité maternofœtale.
ABSTRACT
Aim To describe the clinical, therapeutic aspects, maternal and fetal outcomes, of patients with active intrauterine pregnancy during which they underwent laparoscopic surgery. Material and methods. This was a prospective, longitudinal and descriptive series of cases conducted over a period of 13 years, ranging from 2006 to 2019 at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of the Military Hospital of Libreville. We included all patients with active intrauterine pregnancy who underwent laparoscopic surgery. The pre, per, postoperative parameters and the outcome of the pregnancy were analyzed. Results. We studied 13 cases. The average age of pregnant women was 29 years. An emergent surgery was performed in the first trimester of pregnancy in nine patients (69.2%). The Palmer needle and the camera trocar were introduced in umbilical in 9 (69.2%) patients. Pneumoperitoneum was achieved with the Palmer needle in 10 patients. On exploration, the lesions were right-sided in 9 cases (69.2%) and left sided in 4 (30.8%). We found three ovarian cysts persisting after 16 weeks, seven cases of ovarian cyst torsion including, one case of twisting of appendix at 23 weeks, a para tubal cyst and a heterotopic pregnancy. Concerning surgical procedures, we performed three detorsions, four cystectomies, an adnexectomy and a salpingectomy. No per or postoperative complication was recorded. Twelve patients gave birth vaginally. All newborns had a good adaptation to extra uterine life. Conclusion. Laparoscopy can be used to manage pathologies associated with pregnancy without increasing maternofetal morbidity.
Article Details
References
- - Kammerer WS. Nonobstetric Surgery During Pregnancy. MED CLIN N AM. 1979 Nov ; 63 : 1156-7.
- - Kort B , Katz VL , Watson WJ . The effect of nonobstetric operation during pregnancy. SURG GYNECOL OBSTET. 1993 Oct ; 177(4):371-376.
- - Krzysztof M. Kuczkowski, Laparoscopic procedures during pregnancy and the risks of anesthesia: what does an obstetrician need to know? Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics September 2007, Volume 276, Issue 3, pp 201–209|
- - Ye P, Zhao N, Shu J, Shen H, Wang Y, Chen L, Yan X. Laparoscopy versus open surgery for adnexal masses in pregnancy: a meta-analytic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Mar;299(3):625-634.
- – Mage G, Bourdel N, Botchorishvili R, Canis M, Jardon K, Pouly JL, Rabischong B. Chirurgie coelioscopique en gynécologie. 2nd end. Paris : Elsevier Masson ; 2013.
- - Ngu SF, Cheung VY, Pun TC. Surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy. JSLS. 2014 Jan-Mar;18(1):71-5
- - Leiserowitz GS, Xing G, Cress R, Brahmbhatt B, Dalrymple JL, Smith LH. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: how often are they malignant? Gynecol Oncol. 2006 May;101(2):315-21. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
- - Schmeler KM1, Mayo-Smith WW, Peipert JF, Weitzen S, Manuel MD, Gordinier ME. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: surgery compared with observation. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;105(5 Pt 1):1098-103.
- - Azuar AS, Bouillet L, Dejou K, Jardon YJ, Canis M, Bolandard F, Storme B, Bonnin M, Pezet D, Buc E, Lemery D. Cœlioscopie en cours de grossesse : expérience du centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) de Clermont-Ferrand. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. Volume 37, Issues 7–8, July–August 2009, Pages 598-603.
- - Giuntoli RL 2nd1, Vang RS, Bristow RE. Evaluation and management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;49(3):492-505.
- - Mazze RI1, Källén B. Reproductive outcome after anesthesia and operation during pregnancy: a registry study of 5405 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Nov;161(5):1178-85.
- - Reedy MB1, Källén B, Kuehl TJ. Laparoscopy during pregnancy: a study of five fetal outcome parameters with use of the Swedish Health Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Sep;177(3):673-9.
- - Hess LW1, Peaceman A, O'Brien WF, Winkel CA, Cruikshank DP, Morrison JC. Adnexal mass occurring with intrauterine pregnancy: report of fifty-four patients requiring laparotomy for definitive management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 May;158(5):1029-34.
- - Paul Whitecar, Shannon Turner, Kenneth Higby. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: A review of 130 cases undergoing surgical management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. July 1999Volume 181, Issue 1, Pages 19–24.
- - Lenglet Y , Roman H , Rabishong B , Bourdel N , Bonnin M , Bolandard F , Duband P , Pouly JL , Mage G , Canis M. Laparoscopic management of ovarian cysts during pregnancy. Gynecologie, Obstetrique & Fertilite [24 Jan 2006, 34(2):101-106]
- - David Soriano, Yuval Yefet, Daniel S Seidman, Mordechai Goldenberg, Shlomo Mashiach, Gabriel Oelsner ; Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Fertil and sterl. May 1999Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages 955–960.
References
- Kammerer WS. Nonobstetric Surgery During Pregnancy. MED CLIN N AM. 1979 Nov ; 63 : 1156-7.
- Kort B , Katz VL , Watson WJ . The effect of nonobstetric operation during pregnancy. SURG GYNECOL OBSTET. 1993 Oct ; 177(4):371-376.
- Krzysztof M. Kuczkowski, Laparoscopic procedures during pregnancy and the risks of anesthesia: what does an obstetrician need to know? Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics September 2007, Volume 276, Issue 3, pp 201–209|
- Ye P, Zhao N, Shu J, Shen H, Wang Y, Chen L, Yan X. Laparoscopy versus open surgery for adnexal masses in pregnancy: a meta-analytic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Mar;299(3):625-634.
– Mage G, Bourdel N, Botchorishvili R, Canis M, Jardon K, Pouly JL, Rabischong B. Chirurgie coelioscopique en gynécologie. 2nd end. Paris : Elsevier Masson ; 2013.
- Ngu SF, Cheung VY, Pun TC. Surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy. JSLS. 2014 Jan-Mar;18(1):71-5
- Leiserowitz GS, Xing G, Cress R, Brahmbhatt B, Dalrymple JL, Smith LH. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: how often are they malignant? Gynecol Oncol. 2006 May;101(2):315-21. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
- Schmeler KM1, Mayo-Smith WW, Peipert JF, Weitzen S, Manuel MD, Gordinier ME. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: surgery compared with observation. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;105(5 Pt 1):1098-103.
- Azuar AS, Bouillet L, Dejou K, Jardon YJ, Canis M, Bolandard F, Storme B, Bonnin M, Pezet D, Buc E, Lemery D. Cœlioscopie en cours de grossesse : expérience du centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) de Clermont-Ferrand. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. Volume 37, Issues 7–8, July–August 2009, Pages 598-603.
- Giuntoli RL 2nd1, Vang RS, Bristow RE. Evaluation and management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;49(3):492-505.
- Mazze RI1, Källén B. Reproductive outcome after anesthesia and operation during pregnancy: a registry study of 5405 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Nov;161(5):1178-85.
- Reedy MB1, Källén B, Kuehl TJ. Laparoscopy during pregnancy: a study of five fetal outcome parameters with use of the Swedish Health Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Sep;177(3):673-9.
- Hess LW1, Peaceman A, O'Brien WF, Winkel CA, Cruikshank DP, Morrison JC. Adnexal mass occurring with intrauterine pregnancy: report of fifty-four patients requiring laparotomy for definitive management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 May;158(5):1029-34.
- Paul Whitecar, Shannon Turner, Kenneth Higby. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: A review of 130 cases undergoing surgical management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. July 1999Volume 181, Issue 1, Pages 19–24.
- Lenglet Y , Roman H , Rabishong B , Bourdel N , Bonnin M , Bolandard F , Duband P , Pouly JL , Mage G , Canis M. Laparoscopic management of ovarian cysts during pregnancy. Gynecologie, Obstetrique & Fertilite [24 Jan 2006, 34(2):101-106]
- David Soriano, Yuval Yefet, Daniel S Seidman, Mordechai Goldenberg, Shlomo Mashiach, Gabriel Oelsner ; Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Fertil and sterl. May 1999Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages 955–960.