Main Article Content

Abstract

RÉSUMÉ
Introduction. Un des moyens utilisés pour évaluer la qualité des soins chirurgicaux est la satisfaction des patients sur leur prise en charge par le personnel infirmier du bloc opératoire. l’objectif de notre étude était d’évaluer la qualité de la prise en charge infirmière (PEC) de l’opéré et sa satisfaction à l’Hôpital Régional de Ngaoundéré (HRN). Patients et méthodes. Il s’agit d’une étude transversale prospective conduite dans le service de chirurgie de l’HRN sur une période de trois (03) mois allant de septembre à décembre 2015, en utilisant un questionnaire et un audit observationnel. Les variables étudiées étaient les connaissances et attitudes du patient vis-à-vis de la chirurgie et de l’anesthésie et le niveau de satisfaction dans toutes ses dimensions. Celui-ci a été corrélé au sexe, au score ASA et au type d’anesthésie. Résultats. Un échantillon de 60 participants a permis d’obtenir un taux global de satisfaction de 75%. Les dimensions ayant un taux élevé étaient: les compétences techniques (91.8%), le respect (92.6%) et les caractéristiques du personnel (84.4%). Les mauvaises dimensions étaient: le soutien à l’initiative 47.5%. Conclusion. Ces résultats soulignent l’importance de la prise en charge et prouvent que des améliorations doivent être apportées dans le domaine du péri opératoire et de la qualité des soins fournis.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. One way of assessing the quality of healthcare is to study the satisfaction of patients about the care which is provided by nursing personnel of surgical units. The aim of the study was to assess the healthcare quality provided to patients, and how satisfied they are with focus on the sociodemographic factors that can affect the patients’ nursing at the Regional Hospital of Ngaoundere. Patients and methods. This was a cross sectional transversal prospective study that was carried in n the surgery unit of the Regional Hospital of Ngaoundéré from September to December 2015. Our tools were a questionnaire and observational audit. Our study variables were the knowledge and attitudes of patients in relation to aesthesia and surgery, and the level of satisfaction in all its dimensions during the various stages of the perioperative interventions. Results. Within three (03) months, we have got and handled a sample if sixty (60) patients, using a questionnaire that enabled us to record 3.75 for the total amount of satisfaction and 75% for the total rate. The technical competences were the highest proportion with a total rate of 91.8%, 92.6% for the esteem (respect) and 84.4% for the staff characteristics. But supporting was less, with 47.5%. Conclusion. Our results emphasize some factors that should be improved to provide a better nursing quality care plan to patients during surgical operations.

Keywords

Needs Nursing Satisfaction quality of care Nursing patient satisfaction.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ngaroua, D., Djibrilla, Y., Yanga, P., & Elondou N, J. (2019). Quality of Nursing Care of Surgical Patients at the Regional Hospital of Ngaoundere. HEALTH SCIENCES AND DISEASE, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.5281/hsd.v20i5.1567

References

  1. Beyea S. C, Speaking up for quality and safety. AORN journal. 2008; 88 (1): 115.
  2. Formarier M. & Jovic L. Les concepts en sciences infirmières. Lyon: ARSI; Éditions Mallet.conseil 2009.
  3. Zhao S. H. & Akkadechanunt T. Patients’ perceptions of quality nursing care in a Chinese hospital. International Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2011; 3 (9): 145-149.
  4. Leinonen T, Leino-Kilpi H, Ståhlberg M. R. & Lertola K. Comparing patient and nurse perceptions of perioperative care quality. Applied Nursing Research 2003; 16 (1): 29-37.
  5. Findik U. Y, Unsar S. & Sut N. Patient satisfaction with nursing care and its relationship with patient characteristics. Nursing & Health Sciences. 2010; 12 (2), 162-169.
  6. Rudolfsson G, Ringsberg K. C. & Von Post I. A source of strength– nurses’ perspectives of the perioperative dialogue. Journal of Nursing Management. 2003; 11 (4): 250-257.
  7. Pasero C. & Belden J. Evidence-based perianesthesia care: accelerated postoperative recovery programs. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing. 2006; 21 (3): 168-176.
  8. Royse C. F, Chung F, Newman S, Stygall J, Wilkinson D. J. Predictors of patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery care: a cohort study using the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2012; 29: 1-5.
  9. Lindwall L. & Von Post I. Continuity created by nurses in the perioperative dialogue a literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 2009; 23 (2): 395-401.
  10. Leinonen et al. The quality of perioperative care: development of a tool for the perceptions of patients. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2001; 35 (2): 294-306.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.